A. Kadir Jasin
(If you are commenting “anonymously”, please state your
name/pseudonym at the beginning and end of your comment. Thank you.)
THE PROBLEM with the majority of Western-Oriented Liberals (WOLs) and
their opposition compadres is, despite their claim to moderation and
openness, they are actually pretty intolerant and easily provoked.
While they reserved the right to say whatever they like and damn
whomever they choose to, they do not want to listen to opposing views and hate
being opposed.
That was the key motivation in their condemnation of the Malay-based
non-governmental organization Perkasa and the former IGP, Abdul Rahim Noor as “fascist monsters.”
The sin of Perkasa is it speaks up for the non-partisan Malays. In
recent years, whoever speaks in favour of or on behalf of the Malays are viewed with suspicion and disdain. Very
often they are branded racists and rightists.
Even the Deputy President of a Malay party was condemned when he said
he was Malay first. What good is a Malay party (like Umno) if it does not
believe in being “Malay first”?
What is so terribly wrong for Abdul Rahim, while speaking at the
Perkasa Annual General Meeting on the Deepavali Day, to liken the rise of human
rights movements to communism decades ago?
Human history had seen the rise and fall of countless movements and
ideologies, and until today, people still make all kinds of comparisons and
analysis about them.
In essence, Abdul Rahim was comparing the tactics used by the human
rights movements to those of the communist and their effects on society.
Let’s face it, not all civil society movements that are now riding the
human rights crest, have much to do with the good of human race as a whole.
Many have their own narrow inclusive agendas that, in some instances, infringe
on the rights and sensibilities of the majority.
The Malaysian Insider news portal on Oct 28 reported that “federal
opposition” had branded Perkasa and Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor “fascist monsters”
after the former IGP likened the rise of human rights movements to communism.
What’s so wrong about that? Did
communism not swept much of the world in the post-colonial era and is still
embraced by more than two billion people today?
The very
same people who distrust the Government and frown upon its alleged
victimization of civil society movements are now saying that the Prime
Minister, Mohd Najib Abdul Razak, “must immediately put a stop to this fascism
movement (sic).”They even urged him to openly condemn the former IGP and Perkasa if he is sincere about his political transformation programme.
The cry-babies quoted by Malaysian Insider for wanting the Prime Minister’s executive intervention included the DAP publicity chief , Tony Pua, and PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar.
I think, these great defenders of human rights and freedom should fight their own battle instead of trying to implicate the Government in their attempts to muzzle opposing views. I say, go fight Perkasa and Abdul Rahim yourself!
This is a free country, though people like Pua and Nurul Izzah (I hate to pick on her. She’s like “anak” to me. But she’s now a grown-up and an MP), think otherwise.
So, who are they to say that the views of Perkasa and Abdul Rahim are archaic, irrelevant and misguided?
No views and ideas are archaic, irrelevant and misguided if the people believe them and, I think, there are enough Malays out there who do.
What tragedy and what monsters are they talking about when there are non-Malay organizations in this multi-racial country of ours that fight exclusively for the rights and well being of the their own bangsa?
Of course, in the eyes of these pseudo liberals, whatever organizations and policies that favour the majority Melayus are archaic, irrelevant, misguided and monstrous.
Perhaps they do not realize that it is their constant mocking of things Malay and Islam that has given rise to these so-called archaic, irrelevant, misguided and monstrous Malay rights groups.
Maybe some Malays no longer believe in political parties and partisan politics. Maybe they too are becoming more like the Chinese who depend as much on their NGOs as they do on political parties that claim to represent them.
This is the poser that Umno, Pas and the Malay caucus of PKR may want to think about. Why do Malays joined Perkasa and attended “defend Islam” rally in Shah?
Maybe in their minds, they think that these Malay/Muslim parties are no longer committed to fighting for them and their religion.
And don’t tell me it is archaic, irrelevant, misguided and monstrous when the Malays protect and demand their rights, but fine when other races do the same. It takes two to tango. Comprende? Ada erti ka?