A Kadir
Jasin
PREAMBLE: Views expressed herein are entirely
mine. I am writing in my personal capacity as a blogger. It has nothing to do
with whatever position I may hold.
![]() |
| Unaffordable: Property glut is getting worse |
IT has been a while the Kedai Kopi Assembly (KKA) has not
been convened. Members are busy. Some have even gone on to become ministers and
deputy ministers after the May 9 General Elections.
Some are as easy as ever to meet or exchange WhatsApp
messages while others have surrendered to officialdom and are difficult to
reach.
[Anonymous
comments will not be published. Please use real or pseudonym. Thank you.]
For those who we can easily meet, we advise them
directly. Nobody has to know. But for those who are hard to meet or to reach,
we advise them publicly. Everybody knows.
A former minister of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s 1st
administration (1981-2003) asked me who drafted the 2019 Budget and the budget speech of Finance
Minister Lim Guan Eng.
He said
he received feedback that Treasury officials were not involved instead and the
Budget was the handiwork of the “12th floor boys (and girls)”.
I am not
very sure if the 12th floor is where the Finance Minister’s office
is situated. I have been there only once.
But when
I accompanied Chairman of the Council of Eminent Persons (CEP), Tun Daim
Zainuddin, to Affin Hwang Capital investment conference in Kuala Lumpur, on
Nov. 8, I heard him saying that the Finance Ministry in particular and the
government in general have many clever people.
He then pointed
in the direction of Dr Ong Kian Ming, Deputy Minister of International Trade
and Industry, who was present. I have not the slightest doubt that Dr Ong is a
clever chap.
Back to
the angry former minister, he argued that budget is a highly confidential
document as it involved taxes and critical policies. As a general rule, even
ministers are not involved or are in the know. They are only generally briefed
about it.
But he
noticed that a deputy minister had gone on television to discuss the budget
before it was presented. Maybe it happened by mistake. Thus he wondered who
else outside the Treasury were involved.
What this
former minister is driving at is that confidentiality is important when
planning and drafting the budget, and that the civil servants must be given due
respect and recognition.
Crowd
Funding
Another example
of a possible “leak” is the crowd funding for housing. The budget was delivered
on Friday and on Sunday the parties believed to have submitted the proposal
revealed themselves to public.
While it
is customary for the government to accept proposals from the public, the manner
the people-to-people funding was made public exposes the government to
allegation of cronyism and nepotism.
Yes
Finance Minister can announce this as a policy. But the right way to go about
doing this is to request for proposals from as many parties as possible so that
the government has many options to choose from.
Of course
we want this project to succeed. But this is the first ever such financing
scheme in the world and we cannot stop the people from wondering and asking
questions.
A Singapore-based
fund manager commented: “I read this property crowd funding thing. There is no
such thing as get-fixed-quick scheme. Usually these schemes end up badly with poor
moms and pops losing money and ultimately government bailout like the sub-prime.
“I hope
Malaysian government looks at this carefully and not allow unscrupulous
businessmen make money off the unsuspected.”
Well, I
am still essentially an atomic person. Although I have gone partially digital, I
still visit my bank managers, make phone calls to check my bank
balance and issue cheques to pay my credit card bills.
These
online banking, crowd funding and cloud storage things still do not convince
me.
On that
score, I salute the PNB for bringing back the passbook for its unit trust
funds. Apparently going digital and paperless did not go down well with the
pensioners and the old-timers who incidentally are also its high net worth
customers.
On the
hot subject of housing, the real issue is affordability. Prices have
skyrocketed but incomes have not. Profiteering makes the situation worse.
Daim
recalled at the Affin Hwang conference that back in the sixties he sold a
three-bedroom link house in Taman Maluri, Kuala Lumpur, for RM40,000. Today the
price could be as much as RM500,000.
I will
leave the clever people at Bank Negara and the Economic Planning Unit to figure
this out. But I think if we solve the problem of low wages and incomes we will solve
the housing problem.
Technology
helps. There must be better and cheaper ways of building or, shall I say, mass
producing affordable homes. I understand that at least one large
government-linked property developer is experimenting with the idea of
manufactured houses and apartments.
On
the political front, many people had expressed their views on the Parti
KeAdilan Rakyat’s leadership election. Thank you for the feedback. I think
there are other people who are more competent who are already commenting on this
subject.
In
the meantime the Education Minister, Maszlee Malik continues to bewilder me
with his actions – the latest being the appointment of the former PNB chairman,
Tan Sri Abdul Wahid Omar, as chairman of the UKM board.
Maybe
Maszlee wasn’t aware that Abdul Wahid was removed from PNB or he didn’t agree
with the latter’s removal. Or just that Maszlee is too clever for the
comprehension of ordinary mortals.
Wallahuaklam.





